This is the third of a five-part series of policy briefs presenting findings of a research study on the “Implications of EU-EAC EPA on Tanzania”. The study is part of the broader research and capacity building project ‘Targeted support to strengthen capacity of policy makers, exporters, and trade associations to assess and review trade and related economic policies to promote trade competitiveness and diversification for widening trading opportunities with the EU’, implemented by REPOA and ISS-Erasmus—funded by the European Union (EU) through the EU-ACP TradeCom II Programme. Its contents are sole responsibility of REPOA.
Related Articles
Unlocking Tanzania’s potential: Youth look to jobs, entrepreneurial opportunities
On their top priorities for government action – including health, water supply, infrastructure/roads, electricity, education, and job creation – young citizens give the government positive performance reviews, and a majority see the country as moving in “the right direction.” But their assessments of economic and living conditions are less positive, and economic opportunity tops of […]
Tanzanians applaud government performance on health, but it remains their top concern
This dispatch/ policy brief presents findings from a special Afrobarometer Round 10 survey module focusing on health care. READ ON by clicking the Download.PDF button…!
Why property tax reforms fail: Lessons from Tanzania
Over the past two decades, property tax administration in Tanzania has undergone substantial changes, shifting between decentralized and centralized collection models. However, despite numerous reform initiatives, these efforts have largely failed to boost tax revenues and improve property tax administration. This CMI (in collaboration with REPOA) Insight outlines five reasons why these reforms have not […]
Strengthening Decentralisation and Local Economic Development in Tanzania: Challenges and Opportunities
The research on decentralisation and Local Economic Development (LED) in Tanzania reveals several key challenges and opportunities. One major challenge is the inconsistency between decentralisation goals and actual implementation, where local government authorities (LGAs) often prioritize service delivery over economic development initiatives. The lack of adequate funding, inadequate capacity among local officials, and insufficient coordination […]