Tanzania is one of several developing countries committed to a nation-wide social protection through its flagship programme, the Productive Social safety Net (PSSN), implemented since 2012. This policy brief attempts to explore the challenges behind the shifting in the responsibility of financing PSSN from external funding to the government. Specifically, this policy brief focuses on PSSN/PSSN I (2012-2019).
Related Articles
Safeguarding Digital Labour: Data Protection for Platform Workers
The digital revolution, coupled with the rise of the gig economy has transformed the way work is understood and performed globally. The gig work—temporary and flexible jobs offered by online platforms—has become increasingly prominent in Tanzania as it is in other parts of the world. Gig platforms in Tanzania offer opportunities but also raise data […]
Tourism in Tanzania: status, trend, and existing growth potentials
Tourism plays a significant role in livelihoods & poverty reduction, directly employing over 1.4 million workers and contributing 17% to GDP. Notwithstanding a near 75% decline following the global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, receipts from international arrivals doubled between 2012 and 2023. Synergies between tourism and other sectors can be leveraged to facilitate much […]
Dignifying Well-being of Women: Labour Conditions in Solid Waste Management in Tanzania Cities
Gender disparities readily appear across the waste management value chain, reflecting prevalent imbalances in the socioeconomic structures. Women are predominantly situated in low-pay, insecure roles, and insufficient attention is directed toward addressing their needs during the maternity period. There is an urgent necessity to integrate a gender perspective into decision-making and policy formulation within the […]
Re-examining the Citizens’ Preferences for the Political Party Systems in Tanzania after 1992
After the re-adoption of multipartyism in Tanzania in 1992, the preference of many adult Tanzanians for the political party system changed from a single-party system to pluralism. However, in 2005, the number of citizens who preferred a single-party system surpassed the number of those who favoured multipartyism. This could have been influenced by the heightened […]